Why States Matter More Than Outsiders Assume
Most coverage of Indian governance focuses on the Prime Minister, the Union Cabinet, and Parliament in New Delhi. This gives a misleading picture of where governance actually happens. For the vast majority of India's 1.4 billion citizens, the state government is the primary interface with the state: the police force that patrols their street is a state police; the school their children attend is administered by a state education department; the hospital they visit is a state public health facility; the land records that determine their property rights are maintained by state revenue departments; the ration card that determines their food security entitlement under the National Food Security Act is issued by the state PDS system. Even programmes that originate in Parliament — MGNREGA, PM-KISAN, Ayushman Bharat — are implemented by state bureaucracies under supervision of state governments that have discretion in operationalisation.
![]() |
| Representational Image: Why States Matter More Than Outsiders Assume |
The Ground Reality
- India's
28 states account for approximately 60% of total government expenditure in
the country (Centre plus states combined), according to Finance Commission
and RBI data; state spending in education, health, agriculture, roads, and
welfare is the primary determinant of citizens' experience of government.
- NITI
Aayog's multidimensional poverty index (MPI) and health and education
ranking data show extreme state-level divergence: Kerala's health
indicators match upper-middle-income countries; Uttar Pradesh and Bihar's
indicators are comparable to lower-income African countries, despite being
in the same constitutional and economic framework.
- Police
in India is a State List subject; each state has its own police force with
its own culture, strength, and accountability structures; policing
outcomes — including crime registration rates, crime investigation
quality, and custodial practices — vary enormously across states
reflecting state-level political and administrative choices.
- The
National Food Security Act, 2013 created a central entitlement to
subsidised food; but the beneficiary list (who gets a ration card), the
quality of food delivered, the functioning of fair price shops, and the
exclusion of eligible beneficiaries are all state-level implementation
decisions — producing major cross-state variation in food security
outcomes.
- States'
own tax revenue — from state GST (SGST), property taxes, stamp duties,
vehicle taxes, excise on alcohol, and other sources — ranges from
approximately 40% to 60% of total state revenue depending on the state;
the remainder comes from central transfers (Finance Commission devolution
and grants), making states significant fiscal actors but also
substantially dependent on central transfers.
How It Works in Practice
1. Health and education delivery: The largest public
health and education systems in the world are India's state systems. Primary
Health Centres (PHCs), Community Health Centres (CHCs), and district hospitals
are state-funded and state-staffed. Government schools are administered by state
education departments. The quality and accessibility of these systems is
primarily a function of state investment, administration, and political will —
not central policy. Tamil Nadu's public health system has achieved near-universal
health metrics through decades of sustained state investment; Bihar's outcomes
reflect different state choices.
2. Land and agriculture: Land is a State List
subject. Land reform — redistribution of agricultural land — was primarily a
state-level policy exercise from the 1950s through the 1970s. Land acquisition
for infrastructure and industrial development is now governed partly by central
law (Land Acquisition Act, 2013) but administered and interpreted differently
across states. Agricultural marketing regulation — including the APMC
(Agricultural Produce Market Committee) system — was a state domain until the
2020 farm laws controversy showed how sensitive state control of agricultural
markets is politically.
3. Law and order: Police is a State List subject.
Each state decides its own police-to-population ratio, budget, training,
equipment, and accountability mechanisms. The differences are stark: Delhi has
the highest police-to-population ratio in India (due partly to its union
territory status); Bihar has among the lowest. States with better-resourced
police and lower political interference in transfers and promotions
consistently show better law enforcement outcomes than those without.
4. Welfare schemes and political competition: States
have developed their own welfare programmes — free electricity, free bikes for
students, free mixers for households, cash transfers, farm debt waivers — that
supplement and sometimes compete with central programmes. This welfarism is
partly driven by competitive political dynamics between parties in state
elections. The fiscal costs of state welfare competition have been a recurring
concern of Finance Commissions and economic analysts.
5. Economic growth variation: India's states exhibit
remarkable economic growth variation. Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and
Maharashtra drive disproportionate shares of India's manufacturing and services
output. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have large populations but lower-productivity
economies. This variation is driven primarily by state-level investment climate
decisions, infrastructure provision, labour market governance, and human
capital investment — all domains where states have primary authority.
What People Often Misunderstand
- The
PM's policies do not automatically reach citizens: Most Union
government schemes are implemented by states; a PM-KISAN farmer payment
requires the state to have uploaded eligible beneficiaries' data; an
Ayushman Bharat health card requires the state health system to have
empanelled hospitals; the Centre sets the framework and the cheque, but
states determine delivery quality.
- Southern
states govern very differently from northern states: This is not
simply a matter of resources — the gap in governance quality between
Kerala and Bihar is far larger than their per capita income gap; it
reflects decades of different political cultures, administrative
traditions, and state policy choices.
- States
have their own political calendars: State assembly elections every
five years produce different policy cycles, coalition configurations, and
administrative priorities from central elections; India's political centre
of gravity is distributed across 28 state capitals, not concentrated in New
Delhi.
- State
deficits and debt matter macroeconomically: States' fiscal decisions
affect India's overall fiscal position; state government borrowing is a
significant share of total government debt; the Finance Commission's
fiscal discipline provisions and state deficits were a recurring feature
of the 16th Finance Commission discussion.
- State
elections predict central elections, not the other way around: State
election results in UP, Maharashtra, and West Bengal are among the most
closely watched indicators of the central government's political standing;
state political battles often drive national political trajectories.
What Changes Over Time
The post-2014 period has seen increased central policy
assertiveness — including the Labour Codes, the farm laws (later repealed), the
National Education Policy, and centrally determined agricultural support prices
— alongside increased state political assertion, particularly in southern
states. The GST reform fundamentally restructured state taxation; the 16th
Finance Commission's compliance-based criteria introduce new fiscal incentives
for state behaviour. The 131st Amendment on Lok Sabha seat expansion will
affect state representation at the Centre in ways that smaller and
slower-growing states are watching carefully.
Sources and Further Reading
- Anantam
IAS — Federalism in India: https://anantamias.com/federalism-india/
- NITI
Aayog — Multidimensional Poverty Index: https://www.niti.gov.in/mpi
- PRS
Legislative Research — 16th Finance Commission Report: https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/report-of-the-16th-finance-commission-for-2026-31
- Finance
Commission of India: https://fincomindia.nic.in
