How Indian Media Handles Religious and Communal Content

Indian television news — particularly Hindi-language channels — has systematically shifted toward communal content since approximately 2014. RSF's 2026 World Press Freedom Index documents that "most TV media outlets, particularly in Hindi, devote a significant portion of their airtime to religious news, sometimes openly advocating hatred of Muslims." 

This is a specific documented characterisation that India's most watched news channels are producing content that meets criteria typically associated with hate speech. ACLED (Armed Conflict Location and Event Data) research documented that hate speech targeting religions peaked during the 2023 state election campaigns; BJP won three of the five contested states that year.

Representational Image: How Indian Media Handles Religious and Communal Content

The relationship between media communal content and actual communal violence is empirically documented. WhatsApp-spread rumors about cow slaughter, "love jihad" (false claims that Muslim men systematically seduce women for religious conversion), child kidnapping by outsiders, and market boycotts have directly preceded mob attacks in Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh. 

Media Studies researchers at CSDS and international universities have identified statistical correlations between communal media content in specific regions and subsequent communal incidents in those regions. 

The "media manufacturing violence" hypothesis — that some communal incidents are at least partially enabled by deliberate media amplification of false communal claims — is supported by documented case studies.

What You Need to Know

• RSF 2026 documentation: India's Hindi television channels "devote a significant proportion of their airtime to religious news, sometimes openly advocating hatred of Muslims" — this is the most direct characterisation of Indian media communal content in an authoritative international assessment.
• India Hate Lab (2023 report): documented that hate speech targeting religions      peaked during state election campaigns in 2023; BJP won three of five contested states with the highest hate speech rates; the correlation between election-period hate speech and electoral outcomes has been studied.
• ECI MCC enforcement on communal speeches: ECI issued advisories to BJP leaders including PM Modi during 2024 campaign for MCC violations related to communal speech characterising Muslims as "infiltrators"; the ECI issued warnings but no disqualifications; the enforcement's limitation illustrates the gap between the legal prohibition on communal electoral appeals and actual consequences.
• NDTV Case Study: NDTV under founders Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy was notable for proportionate Muslim representation in coverage, proportionate coverage of minority community violence, and editorial resistance to the communal media trend; post-acquisition, critics have documented a content shift toward less minority-sympathetic coverage; this case study shows how ownership change directly affects communal content.
• The Programming Code for television: Cable TV Networks Regulation Act's Programme Code prohibits content that "promotes enmity, hatred or ill-will between religious, racial, linguistic or regional groups or castes"; enforcement by MIB is selective; channels that consistently produce content that critics characterise as anti-Muslim continue broadcasting without penalty.

How It Works in Practice

1. The primetime communal debate model: India's primetime news debate format — where an anchor presides over simultaneous panelists — has been systematically used for communal content: debates framed as Hindu interests vs Muslim threats; debates about "love jihad" using the conspiracy theory as a factual premise; debates about mosque demolitions, cow protection, and Muslim personal law structured to activate Hindu audience fear and anger. This format maximises TRP while producing content that academic researchers characterise as hate speech.

2. The "national security" framing of Muslim communities: Some Indian news channels have systematically framed Muslim community news in a national security register — covering Muslim neighbourhood development as "population infiltration," Muslim business success as "economic jihad," Muslim religious practice as potential terrorism risk. This framing — documented by researchers at multiple universities — normalises the association of Muslim identity with threat in mainstream media.

3. Responsible communal journalism: Against the dominant trend, some Indian journalism has maintained proportionate and responsible coverage of religious communities: The Hindu's editorial policy; Indian Express's reporting on the Manipur violence; The Wire's coverage of minority community violence; The Print's political analysis that maintains distinction between electoral rhetoric and policy substance. These examples demonstrate that responsible religious coverage is possible; it requires explicit editorial commitment against commercial incentives.

4. WhatsApp communal content and its relationship to media: Television's communal content is amplified and extended by WhatsApp networks; primetime debate clips are shared in political WhatsApp groups with additional inflammatory commentary; the media ecosystem works as an integrated system where television content creates the narrative and WhatsApp distributes amplified versions of it in closed group environments.

5. The Press Council's communal content guidelines: The Press Council of India has guidelines on communal reporting — emphasising fact verification, avoiding rumours, not naming communities in crime stories, and responsible coverage of communal tension. These guidelines apply to print media; they are not enforced; television channels are not subject to PCI jurisdiction; digital media has no comparable enforceable code.

What People Often Misunderstand

• Communal television content is commercially rewarded, not just politically motivated: Anti-Muslim content generates TRP among the dominant advertising demographic; this creates a commercial incentive for communal content that exists independently of any BJP political direction; commercial logic and political alignment reinforce each other but are separate phenomena.
• Not all religious content is communal hate: Indian television covers religion extensively in a neutral or positive register — festivals, cultural programming, religious tourism, yoga and spirituality; the RSF assessment focuses specifically on content that "advocates hatred" not on religious coverage broadly.
• The criminal law on communal incitement is underenforced, not absent: IPC/BNS Sections 153A (promoting enmity between groups) and 295A (deliberate acts outraging religious feelings) create criminal liability for incitement; they are rarely applied to television content despite documented violations; selective enforcement reflects the same political economy that shapes the content itself.
• South Indian media has a different communal content profile: Tamil, Telugu, and Malayalam media — operating in a different political-cultural context with Dravidian political traditions and stronger civil society — generally shows less of the anti-Muslim communal content that characterises some Hindi-belt television; the RSF characterisation of Indian television applies primarily to Hindi-language channels.
• International media misunderstands Indian secularism's context: India's constitutional secularism is different from French laïcité; it accommodates religious pluralism rather than enforcing religious-public sphere separation; evaluating Indian media's religious content against Western secular media norms misapplies context.

What Changes Over Time

The India Hate Lab's systematic documentation of hate speech — released annually in correlation with electoral cycles — is creating an evidence base for civil society pressure on ECI enforcement and government regulation of communal media content. 

The Supreme Court's consideration of petitions on hate speech in India (several cases pending) may produce judicial standards that the ECI and regulators would be required to enforce.

Sources and Further Reading

• RSF — India 2026: https://m.thewire.in/article/media/india-is-157th-out-of-180-countries-on-rsfs-2026-world-press-freedom-index
• ACLED — India Votes 2024: https://acleddata.com/report/india-votes-2024-resurgent-hindu-nationalism-sets-stage-upcoming-elections-driving-communal
• Journalism.University — Media Ownership India: https://journalism.university/introduction-to-journalism-and-mass-communication/new-trends-media-ownership-integration-structural-changes/
• Modern Diplomacy — Hindu-Muslim political divide: https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2026/05/07/india-state-election-results-highlight-growing-hindu-muslim-political-divide/

(This series is part of a long-term editorial project to explain the structures, institutions, contradictions, and operating logic of governance in India for a global audience. Designed as a 25-article briefing cluster on the Indian Media Ecosystem & Journalism, this vertical examines how information is produced, distributed, consumed, regulated, and contested in contemporary India — from television news, newspapers, digital media, and public broadcasting to media ownership, press freedom, journalism ethics, advertising economics, misinformation, platform power, and the changing relationship between the media, the state, and the public. Written in accessible format for diplomats, investors, researchers, NGOs, civil society actors, students, academics, policymakers, and international observers, the series seeks to explain both how India’s media architecture is structured on paper and how journalism, influence, narrative formation, and public discourse actually function on the ground. This is Vertical 7 of a larger 20-vertical knowledge architecture being developed by IndianRepublic.in under the editorial direction of Saket Suman. All articles are protected under applicable copyright laws. All Rights Reserved.)