The Pioneer’s Epstein Files Special Report Used Uncredited Material and Mischaracterised an 'Indian Girl' Without Basis

Concerns relating to journalistic attribution and factual inaccuracy arise from a “Special Report” published on February 16, 2026, by The Pioneer, titled “Indian girl was victim of Epstein, files reveal.” The report cites emails from the recently released Jeffrey Epstein files but does not acknowledge the unearthing of each of the cited documents by another journalist, nor does it adequately distinguish between documented facts and inferred claims.

The report cites a set of emails from the recently released Jeffrey Epstein files, part of a disclosure involving more than three million emails made public by the United States Department of Justice. However, all the specific emails referenced in The Pioneer’s report had already been unearthed a day earlier on X (formerly Twitter) by Saket Suman, editor of IndianRepublic.in, who independently unearthed and contextualised those documents after days of forensic examination of the files.

The Pioneer’s Epstein Files Special Report Used Uncredited Material and Mischaracterised an 'Indian Girl' Without Basis
Image Source: Tanmoyofc on X
Public interaction records show that The Pioneer’s journalist, J. Gopikrishnan, engaged with some of those posts prior to publication. Despite this, the newspaper’s Special Report contains no attribution or credit to author-journalist Saket Suman whose work first brought these India-linked documents from the Epstein Files into the public domain. 

The report adds no new documents, disclosures, or independent verification beyond what had already been unearthed by Saket Suman but presents the material as a proprietary “Special Report.”

Beyond questions of attribution, the report contains a significant factual and ethical lapse. 

The headline and narrative repeatedly describe an “Indian girl” as a victim of Epstein, based on an email referring to an “individual located in India.” The email, as quoted in full, does not state nationality, age, or citizenship. 

“Located in India” could plausibly refer to a foreign national residing temporarily in India, or an Indian adult woman. Elevating this wording into the definitive claim of an “Indian girl” introduces assumptions not supported by the document itself.

In cases involving sexual exploitation, age and identity are material facts. Responsible journalism demands restraint, precision, and transparency, particularly when documents are heavily redacted and sourced from posthumous investigative files. Where information is incomplete, the obligation is to highlight uncertainty and, where necessary, seek further clarification from authorities, not to supply conjecture through headlines.

The Epstein files represent a vast, sensitive archive whose public release places an added burden on journalists to distinguish discovery from duplication, and verification from amplification. When large tranches of documents come to light, journalistic value lies in original sourcing, careful contextualisation, and scrupulous attribution, and surely not in repackaging another reporter’s labour while introducing factual distortions.

At a moment when public trust in media is under sustained pressure, the episode raises broader questions about professional standards, credit ethics, and the responsibility of legacy institutions when reporting on sensitive global disclosures. Attribution is a core principle of journalistic integrity. 

Loading... Loading IST...
25 Years in the 21st Century
Loading headlines...

Loading Top Trends...

Picture in Perspective

Scanning sources...

🔦 Newsroom Feed

    🔗 View Source
    Font Replacer Active